Sunday, November 16, 2008
Unbelievable
Friday, October 31, 2008
let me try this again ....
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79225
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
let me try this again ....
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79225
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
his own words..,
http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79225
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
consider carefully!
at this point going to vote for him, for reasons I normally would not
consider good reasons. My reasoning… He's not Obama. Senator Obama
is disqualified from my vote for many reasons, 1st Is his socialist
political views. Read this transcript of my favorite radio host,
discussing an interview from 2001.
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/17313/?ck=1
He already was someone I could never vote for because of his stand on
Abortion. His lack of compassion for the weakest among us. He tries to
mislead about his stance on allowing babies born alive from botched
abortions to be shut in a dark room until they die. He tried to say
Illinois already had a law that prevented that, so it is why he didn't
vote for 2 bills that would have outlawed it. Sorry that law didn't
exist. He wants our tax money to pay for abortions, he wouldn't want
anyone especially his daughters "Punished with a baby."
The above reasons plus, his affiliations with unrepentant terrorists
including Bill Ayers,( no I'm not calling Senator Obama a terrorist,
I'm questioning his judgment) all lead me to ask anyone wanting to
vote for him. WHAT ARE YOU THINKING????
So as a conservative and someone who wants to preserve our
Constitutional Republic as well as hopefully hold on to what may be
left of capitalism. I will have no other reasonable choice but to vote
for John McCain, though I wish I didn't have to.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
freedom of speech
'fairness doctrine'.
Then, vote Repubican. for all their warts & shortcomings, they at
least will not allow this attack on the 1st amendment.
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
Presidential Character
Republished from www.patriotpost.us
The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men." —Samuel Adams
In his Inaugural Address on 20 January, 1961, President John F. Kennedy closed his remarks with these famous words: "And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
With those words, JFK, considered by many to be the most exemplary leader of the Democrat Party in the 20th Century, asked Americans to put country first, a bedrock principle of the Party until the last few decades.
However today, the current slate of Democrats have turned Jack Kennedy's national challenge on end, essentially proclaiming, "ask what your country can do for you, not what you can do for your country."
In 1963, Martin Luther King stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and said for all to hear, "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
Has his dream been realized, or have Democrat leaders divided us up into constituency groups, where we are judged by all manner of ethnicity and special interests rather than the individual and national character King envisioned?
Kennedy and King had it right, but the Democrat Party has squandered their great legacy, and betrayed us, moreover enslaving many Americans as dependant wards of the state.
This is not the Democrat Party envisioned by Franklin Delano Roosevelt or Harry Truman, much less its founder, Thomas Jefferson, who would not recognize even the most vestigial elements of his once-noble Party. (This dramatic transition is evident in the Democrat Party Platforms from Kennedy to Obama.)
When asked why he left the Democrat Party, perhaps the most famous of former Democrats said, "I did not leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me." That was Ronald Reagan, who earned the respect and support of an enormous number of Democrats during his presidency. His observation, "the Party left me," has never been more true than today.
For several months, we have heard and observed two presidential candidates, centrist Republican John McCain and liberal Democrat Barack Obama. It should by now, be obvious to all of us who put our country first, which of these candidates possess the high qualities of a statesman, and the prerequisite moral and civic virtues for an American president.
Unfortunately, too many of my fellow Americans have difficulty distinguishing these qualities.
Every four years, at the peak of presidential election cycles, we're told by the talkingheads and the party hacks that "this election is the most important in our lifetimes." This time, however, they may be right. These are indeed perilous times.
Our nation is facing crises on several critical fronts, including an historic economic disaster, the resolution of which will require the steady hand of a statesman in possession of outstanding character — character that has been honed over his lifetime, character that is proven consistent with our nation's legacy of liberty and equality.
That reformed Democrat, Ronald Reagan, wrote, "The character that takes command in moments of crucial choices has already been determined by a thousand other choices made earlier in seemingly unimportant moments. It has been determined by all the 'little' choices of years past — by all those times when the voice of conscience was at war with the voice of temptation, [which was] whispering the lie that 'it really doesn't matter.' It has been determined by all the day-to-day decisions made when life seemed easy and crises seemed far away — the decision that, piece by piece, bit by bit, developed habits of discipline or of laziness; habits of self-sacrifice or self-indulgence; habits of duty and honor and integrity — or dishonor and shame."
For the first and final word on the necessary character traits the next president should possess, let's return to our foundation, our Founders, those who risked all to proclaim our individual rights and responsibilities as ordained by God, and outlined them in our Declaration of Independence and its subordinate exposition, our Republic's Constitution.
Our Founders wrote at length about character, both of those who seek high office (or, rather, those that high office seeks), and those who elect them. Here are but a few excerpts in their own words.
John Adams: "Children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom. ... If we suffer [the minds of young people] to grovel and creep in infancy, they will grovel all their lives. ... We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ... We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections."
Samuel Adams: "Nothing is more essential to the establishment of manners in a State than that all persons employed in places of power and trust must be men of unexceptionable characters. ... If men of wisdom and knowledge, of moderation and temperance, of patience, fortitude and perseverance, of sobriety and true republican simplicity of manners, of zeal for the honour of the Supreme Being and the welfare of the commonwealth; if men possessed of these other excellent qualities are chosen to fill the seats of government, we may expect that our affairs will rest on a solid and permanent foundation. ... [N]either the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. ... No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders. ... Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual — or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country. ... Religion and good morals are the only solid foundation of public liberty and happiness."
Thomas Jefferson: "It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution. ... If a nation expects to be ignorant — and free — in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. ... The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest. Only aim to do your duty, and mankind will give you credit where you fail. ... An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens."
George Washington: "No compact among men ... can be pronounced everlasting and inviolable, and if I may so express myself, that no Wall of words, that no mound of parchment can be so formed as to stand against the sweeping torrent of boundless ambition on the one side, aided by the sapping current of corrupted morals on the other. ...[A] good moral character is the first essential in a man, and that the habits contracted [early in life] are generally indelible, and your conduct here may stamp your character through life. It is therefore highly important that you should endeavor not only to be learned but virtuous. ... The foundations of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens, and command the respect of the world. ...[W]here is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths...? Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism who should labor to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness — these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens."
At the end of the Revolution, when our Founders were endeavoring "to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity," Founding brothers Alexander Hamilton and John Jay and our Constitution's author, James Madison, wrote The Federalist Papers, its most authentic and comprehensive explication.
In Federalist No. 1, Hamilton warned, "Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants."
Sound familiar?
In No. 10, Madison cautions, "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm," and insisted in No. 57, "The aim of every political Constitution is or ought to be first to obtain for rulers, men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous, whilst they continue to hold their public trust."
Madison's Supreme Court nominee, Justice Joseph Story, wrote, "Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them."
The Founders thus warned of the perils posed by the candidate who lacks political courage; the candidate who tells us everything we want to hear.
In November 1800, John Adams, in his fourth year as president, wrote to his wife Abigail, "I Pray Heaven to bestow the best of blessing on this house, and on ALL that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof!"
We should all pray likewise, now, today, this minute.
As Adams understood, "A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever."
Almost two centuries later, Ronald Reagan reiterated, "Freedom is ... never more than one generation away from extinction. Every generation has to learn how to protect and defend it, or it's gone and gone for a long, long time."
So, what of the current generation of voters, and the two presidential candidates?
On 4 November, one of these candidates will receive a majority of electoral votes, and in January, be seated as our next president. But for sure, this election is much more than a referendum on the two candidates; it is a referendum on the ability of Americans to discern between one candidate who possesses the character and integrity of a statesman, which the office of president requires, and one who does not.
At this pivotal moment in our nation's history, let's hope that a majority of us have sufficient courage and character to make that distinction, and vote on what we know rather than how we feel.
Let's put country first.
For more information on the character of the presidential candidates, link to The McCain record and The Obama record.
Please forward these insights to your family, friends and associates.
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Just dumb luck or are we the ones who will be fools?
Click here:What are the odds....
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Socialist?
"My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody ... I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody." - Barack Obama 10/12/08 in while in Ohio.
Is he a Socialist? Hmm… You can decide for yourself.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
There is no lesser of two....
for him is Palin. The asinine attacks on her are laughable…
Unfortunately the Joke is on us with the republican ticket that might
as well be Democrat and the Democrat ticket that might as well be
socialist. Both want way too much government… The latter acting like
government is our only hope or at least that with him at the helm it
will be . What we really need is to get the Federal Govt. out of
private business. Granted our current administration isn't helping in
this dept. The congress for all it's complaining about Bush is working
quite well with him to federalize our financial system. It appears
that with either candidate we are heading for a country that could see
capitalism as a thing of the past. I'm not sure how much less damage
McCain will do, his plans spelled out in debate don't comfort me
much,(how do you say we need to cut spending and then propose buying
out "bad" mortgages in the same sentence) but with the alternative, a
product of Chicago politics, that did nothing to reform it and using
Change & Hope as a propaganda tool to mask thinly a socialist agenda
is something we need to avoid. The style is there, the words at time
sound good, but as it is said you can tell the character of the person
by the company they keep. Do a search on William Ayers who worked
with Obama as well as hosted him while launching his Illinois senate
campaign. There are more, but you know when I get too much into
writing about Senator Obama, I get accused of being over the top. The
whole point of this posting is to just basically lament that when I
pull the lever in less than a month (okay, fill in the oval, but it
sounds less impressive) I'm going to have to hold my breath and just
vote, because for the first time since I've been voting, I can't
really stomach the thought of either one being elected. It's
unfortunately too late for an independent candidate to get in the
race. I hope I'm wrong about this, but I don't have much hope that
either one will really do the things that this country needs right
now. I can start looking forward to something better in four years.
This as always is my humble opinion. Feel free to disagree, I will not
debate or argue, if you have a different opinion. I will however read
& consider any response.
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Mixed Feelings about Election 2008
Greetings… I’m really at a loss. Obama/Biden… what a pair. The pair are the #1 and #3 most liberal Senators. This would be fine if the term liberal meant what the original dictionary definition meant. Sadly it doesn’t. Today’s liberal as these two behave, basically means. Socialist. You can hear it very strongly from Sen. Obama. Unfortunately for us, his Change and Hope are going to translate into Higher taxes, more government intrusion and less of the America we grew up with. His wife is a socialist/Marxist … she has stated some (rich people) need to give up some of their pie, so others can have some more…. Gee, what happened to hard work and achievement… oh yeah in the new America, that won’t go unpunished. In a commercial that Obama ran, he wants to impose a “windfall profits tax on ‘Big Oil’” Then redistribute this wealth to the poor people. Wait a minute, since when do we have a maximum amount of profit that we will allow? If the government takes this money, who will actually be paying this tax? It certainly will not be the oil companies… It will be the customers. Oh yeah You and I will pay more at the pump… gee that would be a great idea! Socialized health care… Universal healthcare sounds more inviting, what function of the federal government currently work so well that it makes us think that they’d do a great job running healthcare? I can’t think of one. Taking care of the poor is a great and noble thing…. Recently Obama quoted scripture to show us we need to help the poor, who is this we???? Its certainly not the Federal Government, but that is what the Democrat party has been trying to sell us for years, finally now it has the far left Obama to sell it. The responsibility of this is Americans as Individuals, not the Government taking taxes out of our wages and then inefficiently distributing it to the poor. Unfortunately the answer is not on the Republican side of the aisle either. Mccain is not a conservative… He is the democrat that I would have complained about as far back as I can remember. He’d be your dad’s democrat. (okay my dad is not a democrat, but whatever) So really this election is between a Democrat posing as a Republican, and a socialist posing as a democrat…. HA! Before I could post this, McCain goes and does something I like. Picking Palin as his running mate… She despite all the stupid sleazy things the “unbiased” media are trying to rake her family through the coals with. No it is not contradictory for a conservative to still support someone who’s unmarried daughter became pregnant.. No, I don’t approve of her daughters choice, but as a human being with faults and failures, I know that kind of things happen. The family is not excusing it, they acknowledged it and are moving on. The real hippocrisy is all the left wingers who would claim to be liberated, now hold this and other things against her and her family. Yes her husband had a dui 22 years ago.. just so you know at that same time (according to his book) Obama was snorting cocaine. Let’s get over it and turn this back on the issues. Of course that’s probably why they aren’t doing this, because on the issues McCain/Palin (mostly Palin) has the right answer. To the media, grow up… Your attacks are blatant bias and unprofessional…. Maybe this will be enough to seal the deal of new media being the source for real news. I am biased, I admit it and wouldn’t mind it from these other media sources if they would admit it… here’s what I imagine it could be like… “welcome to <insert news network name> News and public relations for the Obama Campaign”… Okay, they will never admit it. So for all this whining and ranting, guess what, I’m to the 85 – 90 % range of likely to vote for McCain, no actually it really would be voting for Palin. I wonder if I could get a bumper sticker that says Palin first or that just says Pailin. I got it… “Palin – Vice President” You know way back when, they used to run separately from the Presidential ticket, not that it matters now. Hopefully she does temper his left leanings enough to tolerate. I’m just afraid if Obama gets in, we will soon have an updated raw… uh I mean, New deal, bringing more socialism to this great country. Not all change is good.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
support Georgia.
different name. Putin is dangerous. We need to do all we can to
support Georgia and others in the area. Now including Poland. The Bear
is rearing its ugly head.
more to come....
stay tuned for more on the liberal & the marxist.
--
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
Veritas vos Liberabit
Thursday, July 17, 2008
OH MY!
Okay it has been way too long. I will post again here soon, but it's just been depressing… Yeah I have a lot of problems with George W. Bush, but if I could have a choice between the Two horrible choices we have now and him. I'd vote for a 3rd term. I don't care what you're supposed to think… by now we're all supposed to hate Bush. I don't I think for the most part he's done okay. Not great in a lot of things like immigration and leadership on domestic issues. I really think he's been lousy at standing up for himself. He's allowed and caused way too much spending. I'm not talking about the war. I still support both wars we are in. I can argue with people all day about that, but I don't care to at this point.